![]() ![]() ![]() I don't want to feel like I should have stuck with Fuji just because I couldn't sort this out, lol. I know how to select color profiles in Lightroom (I haven't looked into how to do this in Capture One yet) but I don't know where to get them outside of tools like Dehancer (which admittedly may already be most of what I need). I know that you can achieve what Fuji film sims can and more in post with RAW files, but information on quite how to accomplish this is diffuse. However, I'm a RAW shooter, so the advantage of these simulations for people who shoot only JPEG is lost on me. Fuji's simple Velvia is also quite capable of producing stunning images of natural subjects when processed in Capture One. I love Nostalgic Negative, Postive Film, and Vintage Color recipes therein, like, a lot. It isn't even really the film simulations themselves so much as it is the community built around them. However, I still have a few days to decide whether I should send the bulk of my investment into the Fuji system back for a refund, and Fuji still has one thing going for it aside from the noise performance advantages inherent to APS-C: those confounded in-camera film simulations. I can already tell that this system is going to result in more keepers, without doubt, and that's all to say nothing of the computation stuff that-for someone like myself who does landscape and wildlife-is really exciting. ![]() Combined with the 12-100mm, the quality and image stabilization in such a small package is simply impressive (specifically because the lens can reach 200mm equivalent in a form factor smaller than, e.g., an APS-C a 24-100mm equivalent Tamron). Thanks in part to the extremely helpful community here, I recently ordered and received a Olympus E-M1 Mk III.īoth technically speaking and feature-wise, I consider the Olympus to be the superior of the X-T4. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |